‏הצגת רשומות עם תוויות SBL-SSM-*****. הצג את כל הרשומות
‏הצגת רשומות עם תוויות SBL-SSM-*****. הצג את כל הרשומות

יום רביעי, 3 באפריל 2013

SBL-SSM-00044: Virtual host is invalid.



Applies to:


Siebel System Software - Version 7.7.2 [18325] to 8.2.2 SIA[22320] [Release V7 to V8]
z*OBSOLETE: Microsoft Windows 2000

Product Release: V7 (Professional)

Version: 7.8.2.3 [19221] FRA

Database: Oracle 9.2.0.6

Application Server OS: Microsoft Windows 2000 Server SP 2

Database Server OS: HP-UX 11i









***Checked for relevance on 07-Feb-2013***



Symptoms


SBL-SSM-00044, SBL-SSM-00006

During benchmark tests to
simulate login of numerous users, we experienced that after reaching one
limit, no connections are allowed anymore. (the limit is not the same
for each test)

The contengency seems to be at Web Server level, the connection attempt doesn't reach the Siebel Server.
The following error were reported in the SWSE logs:
Code= SBL-SSM-00044: Virtual host is invalid.






Solution



Message 1


The error message "SBL-SSM-00044: Virtual host is invalid" usually
points to a problem with the configuration of the eapps.cfg file or
lbconfig.txt file used for load balancing.

It was found that the
Server SIDs in the Session Manager Rules under Section One of the
lbconfig.txt file required reconfiguration. To verify the correct Server
SIDs log into Server Manager at the enterprise level. Then run the
following command to output the IDs

srvrmgr> list server show SBLSRVR_NAME, SV_SRVRID

More
details on how to structure the lbconfig.txt file can be seen in the
document "Siebel System Administration Guide > Structure of the
lbconfig.txt File" on SupportWeb.

The customer was implementing
Siebel Native Load-Balancing however they had configured Section Two of
the lbconfig.txt file which is only used for Third Party Load Balancer
Rules, so they also removed these references.

Following these changes there were no more errors experienced.










Applies to:


Siebel Reports - Version: 8.1.1.3 SIA[21219] and later   [Release: V8 and later ]
Information in this document applies to any platform.



Symptoms


When running BI Publisher reports it was found that normal reports run
from the UI would execute completely but that scheduled reports would
fail.

Upon examination of the BI Publisher xdo.log the following error messages could be found :


[090811_090327227][][STATEMENT] initConfig(): config file used :null
[090811_090327227][][STATEMENT] initCustomFactories(): loading custom delivery channels :{}
[090811_090327228][][STATEMENT] initConfig(): config input stream was used.
[090811_090327228][][STATEMENT] initCustomFactories(): loading custom delivery channels :{}
[090811_090327228][oracle.apps.xdo.delivery.DeliveryManager][STATEMENT] initConfig(): loading default properties :{}
[090811_090327228][][EVENT] SiebelValidator(Properties prop)
[090811_090327229][][EVENT] endpoint:http://siebel.oracle.com/bipeai_enu/start.swe?SWEExtSource=WebService&SWEExtCmd=Execute
[090811_090327229][][EVENT] adminUsername:SADMIN
[090811_090327230][][EVENT] adminPassword:********
[090811_090327230][][EVENT] Endponit contains no UserName or Password, appending it with Admin's
[090811_090327243][][EXCEPTION] AxisFault
faultCode: {http://xml.apache.org/axis/}HTTP
faultSubcode:
faultString: (500)Internal Server Error
faultActor:
faultNode:
faultDetail:
{}:return code: 500
<html><head><title>Message:</title></head>
<body><h1>Message:</h1>
<p>An
error occurred while trying to process your request. This error
indicates a problem with the configuration of this server and should be
reported to the webmaster (along with any errors listed below). We
apologize for the inconvenience</p>
<p>Error(s):<ol><li>Login
failed attempting to connect to
siebel.TCPIP.None.None://ABC:1534/xyz/BIPEAIObjMgr_enu<li>Login
failed.
SBL-SSM-00044: Virtual host is invalid.
</ol></p>
</body></html>
{http://xml.apache.org/axis/}HttpErrorCode:500

(500)Internal Server Error
at org.apache.axis.transport.http.HTTPSender.readFromSocket(HTTPSender.java:744)
at org.apache.axis.transport.http.HTTPSender.invoke(HTTPSender.java:144)
at org.apache.axis.strategies.InvocationStrategy.visit(InvocationStrategy.java:32)
at org.apache.axis.SimpleChain.doVisiting(SimpleChain.java:118)
at org.apache.axis.SimpleChain.invoke(SimpleChain.java:83)
at org.apache.axis.client.AxisClient.invoke(AxisClient.java:165)
at org.apache.axis.client.Call.invokeEngine(Call.java:2784)
at org.apache.axis.client.Call.invoke(Call.java:2767)
at org.apache.axis.client.Call.invoke(Call.java:2443)
at org.apache.axis.client.Call.invoke(Call.java:2366)
at org.apache.axis.client.Call.invoke(Call.java:1812)
at com.siebel.apps.shared.xmlp.security.BIPSiebelSecurityWSPortStub.authenticate(BIPSiebelSecurityWSPortStub.java:298)
at oracle.apps.xdo.security.SiebelValidator.validate(SiebelValidator.java:124)
at oracle.apps.xdo.servlet.security.SecurityManagerImpl.getSiebelPrincipal(SecurityManagerImpl.java:1366)
at oracle.apps.xdo.servlet.security.SecurityManagerImpl.impersonate(SecurityManagerImpl.java:496)
at oracle.apps.xdo.servlet.scheduler.XDOJob.execute(XDOJob.java:325)
at org.quartz.core.JobRunShell.run(JobRunShell.java:195)
at org.quartz.simpl.SimpleThreadPool$WorkerThread.run(SimpleThreadPool.java:520)

[090811_090327245][oracle.apps.xdo.servlet.scheduler.XDOJob][EXCEPTION]
[ID:651] Unexpected exception occurred while running the job.
AxisFault




Cause


The xdo.log file shows the following error message being returned from the Siebel EAI Object Manager :


Login failed attempting to connect to siebel.TCPIP.None.None://ABC:1534/xyz/BIPEAIObjMgr_enu<li>Login failed.
SBL-SSM-00044: Virtual host is invalid.


From
this it was confirmed that a custom EAI Object Manager was being used
for which a custom virtual directory had been defined in the eapps.cfg
file. Reviewing the configuration for this it was established that
whilst the configuration showed that a VirtualServer should be used
(through the 'EnableVirtualHosts=true' parameter) no VirtualServer
existed in the lbconfig.txt with the name that was referenced in the
ConnectString, in this case 'xyz'.





Solution


In order to resolve this behaviour it was necessary to ensure that the
ConnectString for the virtual directory definition in the eapps.cfg
included a reference to a valid VirtualServer definition in the
lbconfig.txt

For further information on this topic please review the following documentation in the Siebel Bookshelf :
Siebel System Administration Guide > Configuring the System Architecture > Configuring Siebel Server Load Balancing












Applies to:


Siebel CRM - Version 8.0 [20405] to 8.1 [21039] [Release V8]
Information in this document applies to any platform.



***Checked for relevance on 01-Mar-2013***



Symptoms



When load balancing is implemented, the following error is seen in the browser:


"The server you are trying to access is either busy or experiencing
difficulties. Please close the Web browser, open a new browser window,
and try logging in again ..."


The following errors are reported in the SWSE log files:
SBL-NET-01020: Internal: unknown hostname
SBL-SSM-00044: Virtual host is invalid.

This occurs even when lbconfig.txt contains IP addresses instead of hostnames.



Changes


Implementing Load Balancing triggered the problem.



Cause


There is an error in the eapps.cfg file created by the SWSE installation. This has been identified in unpublished
Bug:10534386 VirtualHostsFile refers to lbconfig.cfg instead of lbconfig.txt



Solution


Making the following change to SWSE_ROOT/bin/eapps.cfg resolves the issue:

[ConnMgmt]

VirtualHostsFile = $(SWSE_ROOT)/admin/lbconfig.txt


That is, change lbconfig.cfg to lbconfig.txt and make sure that the path contains / instead of \. 



SBL-SSM-00006: Error while sending message to server



Applies to:


Siebel System Software - Version 7.8.2 [19213] and later
Information in this document applies to any platform.

Error Message Area:Session Manager - SSM

Version:Siebel 7.8







Purpose


This document is intended to provide cause and corrective action
information about Siebel Error Message SBL-SSM-00006: Error while
sending message to server.



Scope


This document is informational and intended for any user.



Details



Explanation


The above error is a generic message that is usually reported at
times when an error occurs in the communication between the Siebel Web
Server Extension (SWSE) and the Siebel Application Server. This error
manifests itself in the SWSE logs files. To enable more tracing in the
SWSE log files, refer to Document 477185.1 How To Turn Up Logging on the Siebel Web Server Extension in Siebel Versions 7.x and 8.x? for more information.

Below is a list of reported causes for this error message:

1.
SWSE has incorrect information in the eapps.cfg file on how to connect
to the object manager running on the Siebel Application Server. For
example, the DoCompression parameter may not be set correctly and cause
this error.

2. The object manager(s) on the Siebel Application
Server are not running, or do not have sufficient resources to service
new requests.

3. Possible incorrect settings for the parameters
defined for the application object manager or for the ServerDataSrc
Named Subsystem. For example, look at the Connect String which will be
stored in the DSConnectString parameter of the ServerDataSrc Named
Subsystem. For the application object manager, look at the parameter
called Connect.

4. If external authentication is being used such
as LDAP or ADSI, then make sure the external server is up and running
and the username and password is correct.

5. The Web Server's
Network cards did not have a Default Gateway Server IP Address
configured correctly. This was determined by running ipconfig on that
machine.

6. The customer had configured their Siebel application
to allow for anonymous browsing however the Anonymous Employee account,
in this example, GUESTCST was not defined in the database. NOTE: Any
user name can be configured as the anonymous user to be used by the
eapps.cfg file. Check the eapps.cfg file and see what you values you
have defined for the AnonUserName parameter. Verify that the database
user account exists in the Siebel database.

7. The Web Server had
disk problems and on the client’s PC, the Siebel High Interactivity
Framework (in versions prior to 7.7, it was called the IE Option pack)
program file that was installed was damaged and caused the user to not
be able to log into the Siebel application.



Corrective Action


Ensure that the server components are available and running with sufficient free tasks.

Below
is a list of corrective actions for this error message. NOTE: The
following bookshelf references are also applicable to the version listed
in the header of this error message documentation:

1. Ensure
that the connect string details and other information in the eapps.cfg
file are accurate such as host name, application and enterprise server
name, ports, VIP/IP addresses, sufficient anonymous user session
settings, DoCompression, etc. For more information about these eapps
parameters, refer to the Siebel Bookshelf > Siebel System
Administration Guide > Structure of the eapps.cfg File.

2.
Ensure the appropriate object managers on the Siebel server are running,
and are configured properly as per the information in Document 476830.1 How to Configure Siebel Object Manager (AOM / SOM) in Siebel 7.x and 8.0.

3.
Use the client GUI or the server manager command line utility to get
the Connect or ConnectString parameters for the application object
manager or the ServerDataSrc Named Subsystem respectively. Make any
changes to these parameters if necessary. For more information, refer to
the Siebel Bookshelf > Siebel System Administration Guide >
Application Object Manager Administration > About Siebel Application
Object Manager parameters > About AOM Named Subsystem Parameters.

4. For more information about external authentication, refer to Document 477424.1
What is the authentication flow when the standard LDAP/ADSI security
adapter is being implemented for Siebel web client in Siebel 7.0 and
7.5? and Siebel Bookshelf > Security Guide for Siebel Business
Applications > Security Adapter Authentication > About User
Authentication.

5. Provide the Default Gateway Server value and restart the web services.

6.
Ensure the Anonymous User account exists in the Siebel database, or try
changing the AnonUserName value to another database account that you
know exists. For more information about the anonymous user and browsing,
refer to Siebel Bookshelf  > Security Guide for Siebel Business
Application > User Administration > Configuring Anonymous Browsing
> About Anonymous Browsing and Unregistered Users.

7. Fix the
disk problems and remove any damaged program files on the client’s PC.
Open a Web browser and go to Tools > Internet Options > Settings
> View Objects to check the status of the Siebel High Interactivity
Framework (IE Option pack) program file. To remove the damaged file,
highlight the program file and click the delete button. Open a new
browser and try to log into the Siebel application again.










Applies to:


Product Release: V7 (Enterprise)

Version: 7.5.3.3 [16172] Fin Svcs

Database: Oracle 8.1.7.4

Application Server OS: Sun Solaris 8

Database Server OS: HP-UX 11i



This document was previously published as Siebel SR 38-1287909151.


Symptoms


SBL-SSM-00006We are having problems viewing, and attaching files in Siebel. This problem started after we
upgraded to 7.5.3.3. When we go to view or attach a file in Siebel (any area), and a new IE
browser window is spawned, we receive an error (see attached "Error" file). When the file doesn't
try to spawn a new browser window just the Siebel dialog box, the error doesn't occur. We haven't
changed any code pertaining to file attachments, this problem just started happening after the
upgrade.





Solution



Message 1


For the benefit of other users, the customer received error messages or
had their connection to the Siebel Web Server time out when attempting
to view or attach files in the 7.5.3.3 Siebel Zero Foot Print Web
Client.



Summary:



The Siebel Web Server log files showed multiple occurrences of the error
messages SBL-SSM-00039 and SBL-SSM-00006. Both these error messages are
indicative of communication timeouts between the client and the Siebel
Web Server. Furthermore, the SBL-SSM-00039 and SBL-SSM-00006 messages in
the Siebel Web Server log files preceded a “SBL-SMI-00114: The
Multithreaded Server has reached the maximum number of concurrent tasks
((null))” in the FinsObjMgr log file. Given these errors in the Siebel
log files, it’s not surprising that the clients received the error
message “The requested site is either unavailable or cannot be
found.”  



Searching SupportWeb for assistance found Service Request
#38-1144701021. The customer followed the resolution and unchecked the
"Do not save encrypted pages to disk" security option checkbox via
Internet Explorer Tools menu > Internet Options > Advanced tab
> Scroll down to Security. This resolved the situation.



<Continued ...>


Message 2


<Continued ...>



However, as the customer wished to be able to view/add attachments with
this box checked due to security concerns, Change Request 12-LVRDGH was
raised with Engineering.



Regards,

Esther Small

Siebel Technical Support



Keywords: 12-LVRDGH, SBL-SSM-00006, SBL-SSM-00039, SBL-SMI-00114, The
requested site is either unavailable or cannot be found, time outs, Do
not save encrypted pages to disk










Applies to:


Siebel CRM - Version 8.1.1.3 SIA[21219] and later
Information in this document applies to any platform.



Symptoms


Environment :
-------------------

Siebel 7.8/8.x / Microsoft Windows 2003 R2 / Siebel Gateway in Clustered Environment.


Statement of Issue :
----------------------------
1)The
issue is that the application errors out during the user working on it
and then they need to relaunch a new web browser and then launch the
application again.

2) The error screen is  "The server you are
accessing is either busy or experiencing difficulties. Please close the
web browser, start a new one and try logging in again " is populated

3) The Web Server and Siebel gateway response is slow.

The SWSE log files contained the following errors




1)GenericLog GenericError 1 00001a164dc80cdc:0
2011-05-09 19:07:54 (ssmsismgr.cpp (1761) err=3670022 sys=0)
SBL-SSM-00006: Error while sending message to server.
2)SBL-NET-01204: Internal: recv() failed: (null)
3)SBL-SMI-00107: Internal: The context for the given task was not found.1*013*smimtpool.cpp3*8490*0*0*0*
4)Line
684167: ProcessPluginState ProcessPluginStateError 1 00003bac4dcf0ff4:0
2011-05-16 07:22:54 2276: [SWSE] Open Session failed (0xa600cb) after
19.2548 seconds.










Changes


Siebel Gateway's setting on the shared network drive are 
troubleshooted so access of data is available from both of the network
paths in the clustered environment.



Cause


The DNS and Network settings of the Web Servers are to be properly
setup for Web Server routing to SWSE component and in between connection
drops due to exceeding firewall idle timeout.

Following errors are also present at the SWSE component level




1)SBL-SSM-00006: Error while sending message to server
2)SBL-NET-01204: Internal: recv() failed: (null)
3)SBL-SMI-00107: Internal: The context for the given task was not found.1*013*smimtpool.cpp3*8490*0*0*0*


Solution



1)In the Siebel command line interface in order to be compliant
with your internal firewall please set the following OM parameter:

change param connidletime=180 for comp <comp_name>

This will prevent connection drops due to exceeding firewall idle timeout.

Please also make sure to set the following event logs:

change evtloglvl EventContext=4 for comp <compname>

Then restart siebel service.

2)
For SBL-SSM-00006 (ssmsismgr.cpp (1761) error , solution is The cfg
file for the object manager does not exist under the
SIEBEL_ROOT\siebsrvr\BIN\[LANG] directory. Copy another working cfg file
to this directory and stop and restart the Siebel Server”

3) Check the DNS registry entries and Network settings.












Applies to:


Siebel System Software - Version 7.7.2 SIA [18325] and later
Oracle Solaris on SPARC (64-bit)

Product Release: V7 (Enterprise)

Version: 7.7.2 [18325] Com/Med

Database: Oracle 9.2.0.4

Application Server OS: Sun Solaris 9

Database Server OS: Sun Solaris 9



This document was previously published as Siebel SR 38-1723398591.







Symptoms


SBL-NET-01204, SBL-SSM-00006


HI,

Please look into this as an extremely urgent issue :-

We are facing some serious problem with our production environment, which is about to go live.

Our setup is;

Siebel 7.7.2 with QF 1007.

We use thin client only.
Around 20 + application server, out of which 8 have eCommunication Object Manager running on them.
3
Sunone web servers with SWSE plugin. CISCO load balancing switches
between web & application servers & also between clients &
web servers.

When we start the servers running eCommunication
OMs, everything works fine for some time (1 or 2 hours).We can hit all 4
OM servers, can see user logged on each of them. But after some time we
start getting server busy error as below.
“The server you are trying
to access is either busy or experiencing difficulties. Please close the
Web browser, open a new browser window, and try logging in
again.[16:41:34]”

We can still connect with server manager from command line & see all components
including eCommunication OM running.

If we bounce eComm OM servers, then again it works for some time.
The eCommunication OM logs on all servers have connection time out messages.

The log files from siebel web server extension & application server attached.



Cause


Configuration/ Setup



Solution



Message 1


For the benefit of other users:

The customer experienced
server busy messages after a certain period of inactivity regarding
network traffic between the web server and the application server. The
customer has installed a Cisco hardware load balancer between the Siebel
web extension and the object manager.

The reason for the
interruption of the tcp connection was that Cisco switch is using a
timeout feature by default that is dropping unused network connections
after a while.

Resolution:

The following setup has
resolved the problem with the dropped connections: the deployed Cisco
model must support the flow-timeout-multiplier feature. This is not true
for all types of Cisco switches. A model that supports this feature is
CSS11503.
See an example for a rule implementing one application server:

owner siebelprod
content name-of-servcie
    add service app-server1
    vip address xx.xx.xx.xx
    advanced-balance url
    protocol tcp
    port 2321
    url "/*"
    flow-timeout-multiplier 700
    active

service app-server1
ip address xx.xx.xx.xx
keepalive port 2321
keepalive type tcp
string /!2.
active


The flow active multiplier will drop the connection after 11200 seconds idle time.


The object manager parameter connidletime has to be set to a slightly
smaller value, 11000, to close and reopen the sisnapi connection
properly.
















Applies to:


Siebel CRM - Version 5.0.0.2 Finance and later
Information in this document applies to any platform.

Server busy error with custom OM -ACSWMTObjMgr_enu







Symptoms



When try get the Siebel login by using custom component - customer Object Manager - ACSWMTObjMgr_enu via


http://<web server hostname>/acswmt_enu


results in the following error message:


The server you are trying to access is either busy or experiencing
difficulties. Please close the Web browser, open a new browser window,
and try logging in again.[23:24:13]

In OM logs, these errors were found


Could not find 'Application' named 'Custom Application Name'. This object is inactive or nonexistent.


...

 2009-10-11 23:07:37 Login failed for Login name : anonemp
 2009-10-11 23:07:39 (ctxtmgr.cpp (4504)) SBL-SVC-00208: Please login first

In SWSE logs, these errors where found

2009-10-11 22:53:16 ( (0) err=4653071 sys=0) SBL-SCB-00015: The component is down or not available on this server

2009-10-11
22:56:21 (smconn.cpp (283) err=1180866 sys=2321) SBL-NET-01218: The
connection was refused by server hcmblysun004a. No component is
listening on port 2321.

 2009-10-11 22:56:21 (ssmsismgr.cpp (773) err=3670019 sys=0) SBL-SSM-00003: Error opening SISNAPI connection.
 2009-10-11 22:56:21 (ssmsismgr.cpp (1761) err=3670022 sys=0) SBL-SSM-00006: Error while sending message to server.
 2009-10-11
22:56:21 (smconn.cpp (283) err=1180866 sys=2321) SBL-NET-01218: The
connection was refused by server hcmblysun004a. No component is
listening on port 2321.



Changes


Created custom Object manager -ACSWMTObjMgr_enu



Cause



Incorrect value for parameter "Application Repository File" -
this needs to reference an .srf that contains the Application used.






Solution



Setting the correct value for the parameter "Application Repository File" resolved this issue.





While the error messages above occurred on Siebel 8.1, the
requirement to set the "Application Repository File" to the correct .srf
name exists for all Siebel versions.










Applies to:


Siebel System Software - Version: 7.5.3 [16131] to 7.5.3.17 [16285] - Release: V7 to V7
IBM AIX on POWER Systems (64-bit)

Product Release: V7 (Enterprise)

Version: 7.5.3 [16157] Fin Svcs

Database: IBM DB2 7.2 FixPack 3SA

Application Server OS: IBM AIX 5L 5.1

Database Server OS: IBM AIX 5L 5.1



This document was previously published as Siebel SR 38-1297856927.

*** Reviewed for relevance on 7-Mar-2012 ***



Symptoms


Customer reported connectivity and response times with one of their notes on the Resonate Site.
Recently, they we added one node to an existing Resonate site to this Siebel Architecture consisting of three servers:


1 Siebel Enterprise Server as the Primary Scheduler

2 Load-balanced Siebel Servers

0 Servers performing backup scheduling

For testing purposes, they disabled Application Server 2.

Application
Server1 receiving traffic and in seconds, and failover worked as
expected.  When the App Server 3 (a new one) was connected, Application
Server l
rules were correctly registered and everything was working as it
should.

When a URL request was sent, customer saw Application
Server 3 receiving the request (Open Connection) but the Siebel login
process took a very long time to connect, and eventually timed-out.

Customer certified the NIC and its hardware Checksum.

Upon review, the SWSE log file contained the following entries:


SisnTcpIp    SisnSockError    1    2004-05-18
15:51:44     85326: [TCPIP-client] recv() failed for sd=41 (err=73 |
Connection reset by
peer)
GenericLog    GenericError    1    2004-05-18
15:51:44    (smconn.cpp 5(399) err=1801023 sys=0) SBL-NET-01023: Peer
disconnected
GenericLog    GenericError    1    2004-05-18
15:51:44    (ssmsismgr.cpp 83(435) err=5600004 sys=0) SBL-SSM-00004: SISNAPI
Hello failed. The server component could be
down.
GenericLog    GenericError    1    2004-05-18
15:51:44    (ssmsismgr.cpp 83(1189) err=5600006 sys=0) SBL-SSM-00006: error
sending
message
SisnTcpIp    SisnSockError    1    2004-05-18
15:51:44     82242: [TCPIP-client] recv() failed for sd=22 (err=73 |
Connection reset by
peer)
GenericLog    GenericError    1    2004-05-18
15:51:44    (smconn.cpp 5(399) err=1801023 sys=0) SBL-NET-01023: Peer
disconnected
GenericLog    GenericError    1    2004-05-18
15:51:44    (ssmsismgr.cpp 83(435) err=5600004 sys=0) SBL-SSM-00004: SISNAPI
Hello failed. The server component could be
down.
GenericLog    GenericLog    0    2004-05-18
15:51:44     ERROR 82242: [SWSE] Set Error Response (User: sadmin Session:
!4.4bfa.3021.40aa65ad Error: 00028344 Message: Not connected to the server.\nSBL-SS

The Object Manager log file contained the following, coinciding log entries:


SBL-SSM-00004: SISNAPI Hello failed. The server component could be down.
...
SBL-SSM-00004: SISNAPI Hello failed. The server component could be down




Changes


SBL-SSM-00004: SISNAPI Hello failed. The server component could be down.
...
SBL-SSM-00004: SISNAPI Hello failed. The server component could be down.


Cause


This is caused by CR #12-LVXBLX (Bug ID 10641666), which occurred on an IBM AIX System running DB2.

In
this environment, the customer was facing login hangs when they
introduced a new NIC (Network Interface Controller), the "IBM
10/100/1000 Base-TX Ethernet PCI-X Adapter - feature code 5701,
14106902" with the features Checksum_OFFLOAD and LARGE_SEND disabled.

While troubleshooting the issue, customer followed the steps documented in My Oracle Support document DOCUMENT 476898.1
in Section II, Steps 6 ("Hardware NIC checksums on AIX"), and 14
("Central Dispatch heartbeat interval too large") but this did not
completely resolve the issue.  This document has since been since
revised, since the command ipconfig -a did not provide information about the LARGE_SEND option.


Solution




When using this NIC adapter with Resonate you must manually set the NIC features accordingly:


1. Execute lsattr -E -l 'deviceName'

Make sure it is set to 'NO'.


2. Recalling that the value of Checksum_offload must be "DISABLED", and it is not displayed by executing ipconfig -a, you must set the value manually.





CR- 12-LVXBLX (Bug ID 10641666) was originally opened to fix this but
has since been closed as not feasible to fix in Siebel.  Resonate is no
longer officially supported after Siebel release 7.5.








Applies to:


Siebel System Software - Version 7.5.3 [16157] and later
z*OBSOLETE: Microsoft Windows 2000

Product Release: V7 (Enterprise)

Version: 7.5.3 [16157]

Database: Microsoft SQL Server 2000 SP3

Application Server OS: Microsoft Windows 2000 Advanced Server SP 4

Database Server OS: Microsoft Windows 2000 Advanced Server SP 4



This document was previously published as Siebel SR 38-1183053761.



***Checked for relevance on 02-NOV-2012***



Symptoms


SBL-SMI-00107, SBL-NET-01023, SBL-SSM-00004, SBL-SSM-00003, SBL-SSM-00006


Dear Tech Support,
We are having a serious issue with our Production url.
http://10.190.170.66/erm_enu
When we login to the url for the very first time,
We get a "Page Cannot Be Displayed" error
[Please look at the Screen shot -Error1.jpg]
When we look at the ERM Object Manager logs, we dont see any new task triggered for the ERM task.

If we refresh the screen, we get the login box, but with a "Page Cannot be Displayed" above the box.
[Please look at the Screen shot -Error2.jpg]
Now, the ERM object Manager log shows the following data:
"2021
2004-02-06 15:03:07 2004-02-06 15:23:14 +0530 00000009 001 001f 0001 09
ERMObjMgr_enu 43120 2640 3088
D:\sea753\siebsrvr\log\ERMObjMgr_enu_43120.log 7.5.3 [16157]
ENUGenericLog    GenericError    1    2004-02-06 15:03:07    Invocation
of Applet Menu New Service::NewExpense is not
allowed.GenericLog    GenericError    1    2004-02-06
15:03:07    Invocation of Applet Menu New Service::NewTimeSheet is not
allowed.GenericLog    GenericError    1    2004-02-06
15:03:07    Invocation of Applet Menu New Service::NewCommunication is
not allowed.GenericLog    GenericError    1    2004-02-06
15:03:07    Invocation of Applet Menu New Service::NewCorrespondence is
not allowed.GenericLog    GenericError    1    2004-02-06
15:03:07    Invocation of Search Client Service::OpenSrchCenter is not
allowed.GenericLog    GenericError    1    2004-02-06
15:03:07    Invocation of Persistent Customer Dashboard::OpenDashboard
is not allowed.GenericLog    GenericError    1    2004-02-06
15:03:07    Invocation of Persistent Customer Dashboard::ClearDashboard
is not allowed.GenericLog    GenericError    1    2004-02-06
15:03:07    Invocation of Persistent Customer Dashboard::CloseDashboard
is not allowed.GenericLog    GenericError    1    2004-02-06
15:03:07    Invocation of Search Client Service::AutoSearch is not
allowed."

If we finally refresh the screen for the third time, we could finally get into the application.

Can you Please get back to us as soon as possible because this is seriously affecting our production environment.





Cause


Configuration/ Setup



Solution



Message 1


For the benefit of other readers:

The customer had to refresh the browser three times before the Siebel Application login page would load.

We
initially determined that the cause of this problem was experienced
outside of the scope of the Siebel Application, as the customer
experienced the same behavior when attempting to display the default
page of their Web Server.

It was determined that the customer was
using a Cisco switch, configured with a Virtual IP address (VIP), to
load balance two Web Servers. The initial page loading problem only
occured when the client connection hit the VIP - if the client went to
the Web Server specific URLs, the pages loaded on the first hit.

The load balanced configuration on the switch was verified as correct.

It
transpired that one of the Web Server's Network cards did not have a
Default Gateway Server IP Address. This was determined by running
ipconfig on that machine. After providing the Default Gateway Server
value and restarting the IIS Services, the initial hit and thus
rendering the Siebel Login page, worked when using the VIP based URL.






Applies to:


Siebel CRM - Version 7.8.2 [19213] to 8.1.1 SIA [21111] [Release V7 to V8]
z*OBSOLETE: Microsoft Windows Server 2003

Product Release: V7 (Professional) and later

Version: 7.8.2 [19213]

Database: Microsoft SQL Server 2005

Application Server OS: Microsoft Windows 2003 Server

Database Server OS: Microsoft Windows 2003 Server



This document was previously published as Siebel SR 38-3304776353.





*** Checked for Relevance on 11-Sep-2012 ***


Symptoms


SBL-NET-01023, SBL-SCB-00011, SBL-SSM-00004, SBL-SSM-00006


We have launched Siebel today. Users are seeing 4 problems:



1. Server busy or problem experienced browser error

2. White screen with progress bar

3. Siebel splash screen with progress bar (no login box)

4. Users get into the system and then get booted out.



When first launched, we had serious avaikability issues as above.

We then changed the following settings:



1. MAX TASKS params for all object managers from 20 to 100 (as recommended in PRR) except fo UK OM which was changd to 200.

2. MAX TASKS for connection broker from 1 to 2.



Since these changes users have been able to access, but within last 1 hour we have again seen the same issues.



Cause


Encryption for the communication between Siebel web server and Siebel servers is set to MSCRYPTO



Solution



Message 1


As per the client description their siebel web client became unavailable at certain times.

After investigations the symptoms were found to be as follows:

On the siebel application server there was a siebmtshmw process that
became to use 100% CPU. This process did not became unresponsive but
instead to became idle when no requests where processed it went to
100%CPU. On a 4 processor box when there were 4 siebmtshmw processes
that went in this state the machine begun to respond very slow this
resulting in dropping new sessions and overall log responses to
incomming requests.

On the web server machine (IIS) there was present the same situation
(the siebel extensions out of process begun to consume 100%CPU)

The thread that consumed CPU was identified from the performance monitor
logs and then core dump where taken from these processes. The thread
was a communication thread between the siebel web extensions (SWSE) and
object manager (OM). The call stack for the corresponding thread was:



sslcnapi!compress_write+0xdb

sslcnapi!zlib_inflate+0x8d

sslcnapi!CSSSISConn::_DecodeRawMsg+0x158

sslcnapi!CSSSISConn::SisAsyncThreadMain+0x8d

sslcosd!OSDThreadStart+0x1c0 sslcosd!OSDNTThreadStart+0xc

msvcr70!beginthreadex+0xba

kernel32!GetModuleFileNameA+0xeb

...



The relevant line in the communication call stack is
CSSSISConn::_DecodeRawMsg. The customer had the encryption for the
communication set to MSCRYPTO. This encryption is not largely used or
recommended by Siebel. After setting the encryption to NONE the problem
did not re-occurred.



Resolution:



The customer choose to check if they need encrypted communication
between the web server and the application servers and if this is the
case use SSL instead.


















Applies to:


Siebel System Software - Version: 7.5.3.6 [16186] to 8.1.1.3[21219] - Release: V7 to V8
z*OBSOLETE: Microsoft Windows 2000

Product Release: V7 (Enterprise)

Version: 7.5.3.6 [16186]

Database: Microsoft SQL Server 2000

Application Server OS: Microsoft Windows 2000 Advanced Server SP 3

Database Server OS: Microsoft Windows 2000 Advanced Server SP 3



This document was previously published as Siebel SR 38-1657913758.



Symptoms


Hi,

We are trying to renew the certificates, which will expire
on 12/22/05, for SSL encryption on our Siebel Enterprise Server. Before
implementing the new certificate to production, we are testing the
process in QA environment. We replaced the old certificate file,
certificate authority file and private key file with the new certificate
files on Siebel Server and SWSE (Web Server), but we have connection
issue. Please advise.


Attached please find the swse logs, eapps.cfg and siebns.dat. Please let me know if you need any other information.

Thanks!!



Cause


SBL-NET-01562: Unable to load private key D:\SSL\365key.pem


Solution



For the benefits of other users:

Customer is trying
to renew the certificate which is used for SISNAPI SSL encryption on
the Siebel Enterprise Server. SWSE log reported following error.

SBL-NET-01023: Peer disconnected
SBL-SSM-00004: SISNAPI Hello failed. The server component could be down.
SBL-SSM-00006: error sending message

Customer had been suggested to perform the following:

- Check and verify that the Object Manager is running.
- Increased the event logging for the correspondence Object Manager. Error below was reported on the Object Manager log.

SBL-NET-01562: Unable to load private key D:\SSL\365key.pem

Solution:

The
corrective action of the above error is to verify that the key is in
PEM format, and that the password for the key is correct. There is a
parameter named "keyfilepassword" which need to be set correspondence to
the password entered when generate the key. This parameter can be set
using srvrmgr command below.

srvrmgr /g gateway /e enterprise /s server /u username /p password
srvrmgr> change params keyfilepassword=<password> for server <server>

After setting the correct password, the system is backed up and running.













Applies to:


Siebel CRM - Version: 7.8.2.14 SIA[19251] and later   [Release: V7 and later ]
This problem can occur on any platform.


Symptoms



Statement of Issue:

-----------------------------

When access siebel throuth web UI, there is an error message pop up (server busy error).



Environment:

-------------------

7.8.2.14 SIA[19251]



Steps:

---------

1. Launch web client login to application (http://xx/econsumersector_enu/)

2. Server busy related error returned

3. Click refresh, login page displayed and login success



Error:

-------

The server you are trying to access is either busy or experiencing difficulties.



Expected Behavior:

---------------------------

Login page displayed without click on refresh.



Actual Behavior:

-----------------------

Error message below returned and only upon refresh login page displayed properly

The server you are trying to access is either busy or experiencing difficulties.



Business Impact:

-------------------------

Server busy error when launch web client login and need refresh intervention to get login page.


Cause



The cause of the issue is improper timeout setting.


SWSE log attached reported following error.


SisnTcpIp SisnSockError 1 0 2011-11-15 17:17:54 79: [TCPIP-client] recv() failed for sd=24 (err=145 | Connection timed out)

GenericLog GenericError 1 0 2011-11-15 17:17:55 (ssmsismgr.cpp (863)
err=1801204 sys=0) SBL-NET-01204: Internal: recv() failed: (null)

GenericLog GenericError 1 0 2011-11-15 17:17:55 (ssmsismgr.cpp (1726)
err=5600006 sys=0) SBL-SSM-00006: Error while sending message to server.



And timeout setting gather from customer as follow.


Firewall - TCP session timout : 3600 seconds  

eapps.cfg SessionTimeout      = 900

ALTEON switch timeout (in front of web server) is 10 minutes (600 seconds)


Refer "Frequent Connectivity Problem with Thin Client on Production error SBL-NET-01204 (Doc ID 527426.1)" for similar issue.


Solution



1) Review "Siebel Application Timeout Setting Guideline (Doc ID 838460.1)" for the recommended and guideline for timeout setting

2)
Adjust timeout setting for Connidletime(AOM paramater), ALTEON switch
and/or eapps.cfg SessionTimeout. For example, to keep the current ALTEON
switch timeout setting to 600 seconds (10 minutes), adjust eapps.cfg
timeout setting to 500 seconds and application object manager
Connidletime parameter setting to 550.

Customer confirm issue resolved after implement the change suggested as above.






 







 

SBL-SSM-00005: Timeout occurred while opening SISNAPI connection



Applies to:


Siebel Communications CRM - Version 8.1.1.3 SIA[21219] and later
Information in this document applies to any platform.



Symptoms


Siebel 8.1.1.3 SIA[21219] is installed on IBM AIX on POWER Systems (64-bit)





Connected to srvrmgr at server level and "list comp" command is executed. Which resoluted in below errors:



SBL-SCM-00028: Key not found

SBL-SSM-00005: Timeout occurred while opening SISNAPI connection.








Changes


 No changes were happened and evevry thins was working as expected



Cause


srvrmgr might show SBL-SSM-00005 or SBL-ADM-02049 errors when trying to run simultaneously.



Solution


Rebooting all application servers including gateway resolved the issue.














Applies to:


Siebel System Software - Version 8.0.0.9[20433] and later
Siebel CRM - Version 8.0.0.9[20433] and later
Information in this document applies to any platform.



Purpose


This note is only applicable to version Siebel 8.0.0.9 and 8.1 and
above, and illustrates troubleshooting steps including a workaround for
the behavior described in the following alert:




Siebel Connection Broker May Be Blocked by a Hanging Object Manager Process Document 473950.1.


The scenario that SCBroker can not connect a new session to an
existing object manager process because this process itself is hanging,
can usually be determined by the following entry in the swse log file:



2011-05-13 16:31:54 56: [SWSE] Open Session failed (0xa600d1) after 60.1958 seconds.

ProcessPluginRequest ProcessPluginRequestError 1 000010844d5a0a7a:0
2011-05-13 16:31:54 56: [SWSE] Failed to obtain a session ID. Login
failed attempting to connect to %1
ProcessPluginRequest
ProcessPluginRequestError 1 000010844d5a0a7a:0 2011-05-13 16:31:54 56:
[SWSE] Set Error Response (Session: Error: 10879185 Message: Login
failed attempting to connect to
siebel.TCPIP.None.None://hostname:2361/enterprise/SCCObjMgr_enu)
ProcessPluginRequest ProcessPluginRequestError 1 000010844d5a0a7a:0 2011-05-13 16:31:54 56: [SWSE] Login failed.
SBL-SSM-00005: Timeout occurred while opening SISNAPI connection.

SisnapiLayerLog Error 1 000010894d5a0a7a:0 2011-05-13 16:32:10108:
[SISNAPI] Async Thread: connection (0x2cdadb8), error (1180682) while
reading message
GenericLog GenericError 1 0000108a4d5a0a7a:0
2011-05-13 16:33:24 (ssmsismgr.cpp (0) err=0 sys=0) SBL-GEN-00000:
(ssmsismgr.cpp: 0) errorcode = 0, system error = 0, msg1 = (null), msg2 =
(null), msg3 = (null), msg4 =(null)
ObjMgrSessionLog Error 1 0000108a4d5a0a7a:0 2011-05-13 16:33:24 Login failed for Login name : SADMIN

ProcessPluginState ProcessPluginStateError 1
0000108a4d5a0a7a:02011-05-13 16:33:24 71: [SWSE] Open Session failed
(0xa600d1) after 60.0111 seconds.


Note the last line where we see a connection timeout of 60 seconds displayed.

This is the built in timeout of 60 seconds after which a request from SWSE plugin to the SCBroker is cancelled.


From that message we can conclude that SCBroker was not able to
transfer a login request to a working object manager on node 'hostname'


We can also conclude that the object manager process is still running
since it is still in SCBrokers routing table, however it does not accept
new connections.

This is usually caused by an MT process hang scenario.

Now we are facing two challenges:


a) which process id exactly  is hanging  ? Imagine if we have for
example 25 MT server processes running on that node, this is not easy to
determine.

and

b) why is this process hanging ?


In the next section we will describe how we can find out which pid is
hanging, how to mitigate the situation and what diagnostic data should
be captured to help with investigation of b)



Troubleshooting Steps


To help us in this situation there is a new SCBroker parameter that
has been introduced with the Fixpacks as indicated above. Its name is
ConnForwardAlgorithm or "Connection Forward algorithm for SCBroker".

This is a hidden parameter.


This parameter determines which algorithm is used to forward incoming
login requests to MT server processes. There are two possible methods:

a) Least Loaded "LL", the default
and
b) Round Robin "RR"



Note that this parameter is an advanced parameter as can be seen in following srvrmgr example:



srvrmgr> list advanced param ConnForwardAlgorithm for comp SCBroker show PA_ALIAS, PA_VALUE, PA_NAME

PA_ALIAS                   PA_VALUE       PA_NAME
--------------------       --------       -----------------------------------------
ConnForwardAlgorithm       LL             Connection Forward algorithm for SCBroker





Although LL is
advisable in terms of performance, in case of a SCBroker hang this is
causing unwanted behavior: once SCBroker has identified the least loaded
process, it will reconnect to this particular pid until next session is
established. Now in the case that the supposed to be least loaded
process is hanging, SCBroker will try that process again and again and
we might see stalling logins on all web servers.

In this situation, the algorithm should be changed to "RR".
This has two advantages:


1) The hanging process will only be contacted once. Next attempt is
going to next available pid as described in the routing table. The
effect will be that only one login is affected, and the consecutive
logins will be successful until the hanging process is revisited. In
that way, all requests will be distributed among the remaining,
non-hanging processes and end users should get server busy message only
once and a retry should them connect to a working process.

2) By monitoring the task distribution you can identify the process id that is not getting additional hits.
This process id is very likely the culprit.

Now you can take a userdump or pstack  as per Document 478050.1 or Document 478027.1
for exactly this one single process and then bounce that pid
afterwards. This should greatly reduce the effort to get the right call
stack of the hanging process to TechSupport in order to do root cause
analysis.


The following srvrmgr command can be used in order to switch the forwarding mode:



Using srvrmgr with the /s switch, connect to the
siebel server corresponding to the hostname as identified by the
hostname in the swse error message.

Then change the parameter:

change param ConnForwardAlgorithm=RR for comp SCBroker

Now restart SCBroker component:

shutdown fast comp SCBroker
startup comp SCBroker

Now you can monitor for which particular process id the number of running tasks value is not increasing anymore:

list procs for comp <interactive_comp_name> show TK_PID,TK_NUM_NORMAL_TASKS


If you encounter hanging processes on multiple server nodes,
then you need to change the parameter value to RR on all of these nodes.


Please note that the SCBroker forwarding mode is local to each siebel
server in the enterprise, so you can have mixed LL and RR configuration
within an enterprise.

It should also be mentioned that existing, established sessions are not affected by the SCBroker component  bounce.

Established session will continue to work even when the SCBroker is temporarily unavailable.


By running the round robin scheduler mode  of versions as stated above,
it is possible to distribute incoming login requests to all processes
that in this moment are still able to process requests.

This new parameter is documented in the following documentation:
     Siebel 8.0 Deployment Planning Guide > Siebel Architecture Overview > About Siebel Connection Broker
     Siebel 8.1 Deployment Planning Guide > Siebel Architecture Overview > About Siebel Connection Broker



SBL-SSM-00004: SISNAPI Hello failed.



Applies to:


Siebel eConfigurator - Version 8.1.1 SIA [21111] and later
Information in this document applies to any platform.



Symptoms


Errors with Remote Configurator when using WebServices



ERRORS FROM THE LOG:




  • StpExec Create 4 00000007504f6a50:0 2012-09-11 18:42:25 Creazione istanza della definizione del passo 'Begin Configuration'.

  • GenericLog GenericError 1 00000002504f1e77:0 2012-09-11 18:42:26 ( (0) err=4653064 sys=0) SBL-SCB-00008: Componente ((null)) non disponibile su questo server.

  • GenericLog GenericError 1 00000002504f4126:0 2012-09-11 18:42:26 ( (0) err=4653064 sys=0) SBL-SCB-00008: Componente ((null)) non disponibile su questo server.

  • GenericLog GenericError 1 00000002504f1e82:0 2012-09-11 18:42:26 ( (0) err=4653064 sys=0) SBL-SCB-00008: Componente ((null)) non disponibile su questo server.

  • GenericLog GenericError 1 00000002504f1e82:0 2012-09-11 18:42:26 (ssmsismgr.cpp (626) err=3670020 sys=0) SBL-SSM-00004: Si è verificato un errore relativo a SISNAPI Hello. Il componente server potrebbe non essere disponibile.

  • ObjMgrLog Error 1 00000002504f1e82:0 2012-09-11 18:42:27 (rmodel.cpp (2239)) SBL-SVC-00213: Login fallito.

  • ObjMgrLog Error 1 00000002504f1e82:0 2012-09-11 18:42:27 (rmodel.cpp (2279)) SBL-SVC-00209: Login non riuscito durante il tentativo di connessione a siebel://VirtualServer/ENTPRE81/eProdCfgObjMgr_ITA

  • Error Error 1 00000002504f1e82:0 2012-09-11
    18:42:27 Cfg Server Manager error: unable to connect to server
    eProdCfgObjMgr_ITA for product 1-134L7F using connect string
    siebel://VirtualServer/ENTPRE81/eProdCfgObjMgr_ITA - Login non riuscito
    durante il tentativo di connessione a
    siebel://VirtualServer/ENTPRE81/eProdCfgObjMgr_ITA(SBL-SVC-00209
    )

  • ObjMgrBusServiceLog Error 1 00000002504f1e82:0 2012-09-11 18:42:27 (configsvc.cpp (1486)) SBL-CFG-00155: Complex Object Instance Service Internal Error:

  • ObjMgrLog Error 1 00000002504f1e82:0 2012-09-11 18:42:27 (stepexec.cpp (1572)) SBL-BPR-00162: Errore nel richiamo del servizio 'Configurator Web Service', metodo 'BeginConfiguration' al passo 'Begin Configuration'.







STEPS

The issue can be reproduced with the following steps:

1. Enable Remote Configurator

2. Run a WebService like BeginConfiugration

=> Errors





Cause


EAI Object Manager is trying to launch the default Configurator Component: eProdCfgObjMgr_ITA

However, this component was disabled. Instead cloned components have
been enabled like eProdCfgObjMgr2_ita, eProdCfgObjMgr3_ita,
eProdCfgObjMgr4_ita. But the application is not trying to start it.



The EAI didn't follow the routing of the ecfgserver.txt because it was
automatically deployed by Administration Cache view only on the Siebel
File System set at the Enterprise level and not also on the local Siebel
File System indicated on "Product Configurator - FS location" parameter
of the EAI Object Manager.







Solution


"Product Configurator - FS location" parameter of the EAI Object Manager need to be set appropriately.










Applies to:


Siebel System Software - Version: 7.5.3 [16131] to 7.5.3.17 [16285] - Release: V7 to V7
IBM AIX on POWER Systems (64-bit)

Product Release: V7 (Enterprise)

Version: 7.5.3 [16157] Fin Svcs

Database: IBM DB2 7.2 FixPack 3SA

Application Server OS: IBM AIX 5L 5.1

Database Server OS: IBM AIX 5L 5.1



This document was previously published as Siebel SR 38-1297856927.

*** Reviewed for relevance on 7-Mar-2012 ***



Symptoms


Customer reported connectivity and response times with one of their notes on the Resonate Site.
Recently, they we added one node to an existing Resonate site to this Siebel Architecture consisting of three servers:


1 Siebel Enterprise Server as the Primary Scheduler

2 Load-balanced Siebel Servers

0 Servers performing backup scheduling

For testing purposes, they disabled Application Server 2.

Application
Server1 receiving traffic and in seconds, and failover worked as
expected.  When the App Server 3 (a new one) was connected, Application
Server l
rules were correctly registered and everything was working as it
should.

When a URL request was sent, customer saw Application
Server 3 receiving the request (Open Connection) but the Siebel login
process took a very long time to connect, and eventually timed-out.

Customer certified the NIC and its hardware Checksum.

Upon review, the SWSE log file contained the following entries:


SisnTcpIp    SisnSockError    1    2004-05-18
15:51:44     85326: [TCPIP-client] recv() failed for sd=41 (err=73 |
Connection reset by
peer)
GenericLog    GenericError    1    2004-05-18
15:51:44    (smconn.cpp 5(399) err=1801023 sys=0) SBL-NET-01023: Peer
disconnected
GenericLog    GenericError    1    2004-05-18
15:51:44    (ssmsismgr.cpp 83(435) err=5600004 sys=0) SBL-SSM-00004: SISNAPI
Hello failed. The server component could be
down.
GenericLog    GenericError    1    2004-05-18
15:51:44    (ssmsismgr.cpp 83(1189) err=5600006 sys=0) SBL-SSM-00006: error
sending
message
SisnTcpIp    SisnSockError    1    2004-05-18
15:51:44     82242: [TCPIP-client] recv() failed for sd=22 (err=73 |
Connection reset by
peer)
GenericLog    GenericError    1    2004-05-18
15:51:44    (smconn.cpp 5(399) err=1801023 sys=0) SBL-NET-01023: Peer
disconnected
GenericLog    GenericError    1    2004-05-18
15:51:44    (ssmsismgr.cpp 83(435) err=5600004 sys=0) SBL-SSM-00004: SISNAPI
Hello failed. The server component could be
down.
GenericLog    GenericLog    0    2004-05-18
15:51:44     ERROR 82242: [SWSE] Set Error Response (User: sadmin Session:
!4.4bfa.3021.40aa65ad Error: 00028344 Message: Not connected to the server.\nSBL-SS

The Object Manager log file contained the following, coinciding log entries:


SBL-SSM-00004: SISNAPI Hello failed. The server component could be down.
...
SBL-SSM-00004: SISNAPI Hello failed. The server component could be down




Changes


SBL-SSM-00004: SISNAPI Hello failed. The server component could be down.
...
SBL-SSM-00004: SISNAPI Hello failed. The server component could be down.


Cause


This is caused by CR #12-LVXBLX (Bug ID 10641666), which occurred on an IBM AIX System running DB2.

In
this environment, the customer was facing login hangs when they
introduced a new NIC (Network Interface Controller), the "IBM
10/100/1000 Base-TX Ethernet PCI-X Adapter - feature code 5701,
14106902" with the features Checksum_OFFLOAD and LARGE_SEND disabled.

While troubleshooting the issue, customer followed the steps documented in My Oracle Support document DOCUMENT 476898.1
in Section II, Steps 6 ("Hardware NIC checksums on AIX"), and 14
("Central Dispatch heartbeat interval too large") but this did not
completely resolve the issue.  This document has since been since
revised, since the command ipconfig -a did not provide information about the LARGE_SEND option.


Solution




When using this NIC adapter with Resonate you must manually set the NIC features accordingly:


1. Execute lsattr -E -l 'deviceName'

Make sure it is set to 'NO'.


2. Recalling that the value of Checksum_offload must be "DISABLED", and it is not displayed by executing ipconfig -a, you must set the value manually.





CR- 12-LVXBLX (Bug ID 10641666) was originally opened to fix this but
has since been closed as not feasible to fix in Siebel.  Resonate is no
longer officially supported after Siebel release 7.5.














Applies to:


Siebel CRM - Version 8.1.1.1 SIA [21211] and later
Information in this document applies to any platform.



Symptoms


Number of srvrmgr command session (CP_NUM_RUN_TASKS for ServerMgr
component) may reach Maxtasks (20 by default) even though the number of
actual sessions are much less. As a result, following error is reported.





-------------------------------------------------


Connected to 0 server(s) out of a total of 4 server(s) in the enterprise





SBL-NET-01023: Peer disconnected


SBL-SSM-00004: SISNAPI Hello failed. The server component could be down.


-------------------------------------------------



Cause


It is possible to start srvrmgr command without /S parameter then
specify the Siebel Server name to run various operation such as "run
task". Doing so the number of active tasks on ServerMgr component on
each Siebel Server is increased. If /S parameter is specified to start
srvrmgr command, the active task count is increased only on the
specified Siebel Server. Here are some examples for each scenario.





<Example>: There are two Siebel Servers A and B. It is assumed
all srvrmgr command sessions keep running simultaneously, because tasks
are started by "run task" and they take some time to finish. Here is how
the number of active tasks on ServerMgr component is increased.





1) With /S parameter.


                         Number of active tasks for ServerMgr component


                        A          B


- srvrmgr /s A     1          0


- srvrmgr /s B     1          1


- srvrmgr /s B     1          2


- srvrmgr /s A     2          2                      








2) Without /S parameter


                         Number of active tasks for ServerMgr component


                        A          B


- srvrmgr            1          1


- srvrmgr            2          2


- srvrmgr            3          3


- srvrmgr            4          4                      








3) combination of 1) and 2)


                          Number of active tasks for ServerMgr component


                         A          B


- srvrmgr             1          1


- srvrmgr /s B      1          2


- srvrmgr /s A      2          2                      


- srvrmgr            3          3





Even though all the scenario run four srvrmgr commands, the number of
active tasks for ServerMgr component have different values.





By default, Maxtasks parameter for ServerMgr component is set to 20.
If the number of Siebel Server is four and each runs five srvrmgr
command simultaneously, it reaches the maxtasks (4 * 5 = 20) therefore
starting the next srvrmgr command fails with the following error.





-------------------------------------------------


Connected to 0 server(s) out of a total of 4 server(s) in the enterprise





SBL-NET-01023: Peer disconnected


SBL-SSM-00004: SISNAPI Hello failed. The server component could be down.


-------------------------------------------------


 To verify if this is the case, please monitor the value on CP_NUM_RUN_TASKS for ServerMgr component.



Solution


Here are several ways to resolve this behavior.





1) Increase number of Maxtasks parameter for component ServerMgr on each Siebel Server.


2) Specify /S parameter to start srvrmgr command.


3) Decrease the number of srvrmgr sessions that run simultaneously.


4) Use "start task" instead of "run task" to minimize the session time for srvrmgr.










Applies to:


Siebel CRM - Version 7.5.2 [16007] to 8.1 [21039] [Release V7 to V8]
Oracle Solaris on SPARC (64-bit)

Product Release: V7 (Enterprise)

Version: 7.5.3.8 [16192]

Database: Oracle 9.2.0.4

Application Server OS: Sun Solaris 8

Database Server OS: Sun Solaris 8



This document was previously published as Siebel SR 38-3155380661.

*** Reviewed relevance on 6-Feb-2012 ***







Symptoms


Customer reported the following:
Siebel CRM version 7.5.3.15 id using Resonate and Netegrity Siteminder for Web Single Sign-On.

Users are getting Server Busy Error when trying to log into Sales and eChannel Applications, but only for ENU locale.

Currently
logged users are working fine, and users are able to successfully log
into applications for other locales, such as FRA.

If the system is rebooted, everything comes up again and users can log in normally.
This behavior is being reproduced every day, during peak hours.

We have reviewed Siebel Web Server Extension log files, and found several occurrences of SISNAPI Hello handshake timing out:




Hello handshake to (...) timed out in 60 secs
SBL-NET-01033: The SISNAPI handshake timed out, the Siebel Service may not be running


After 11 retries, the following is being logged by SWSE:




SBL-SSM-00004: SISNAPI Hello failed. The server component could be down.
Open(..., 60, 3600) = [NULL, 2100101]
Open Session failed (0x6ce5) after 711.2367 seconds.
OpenSession Timing: 711.23671 seconds
New anon session open failed.
Could not get an anon session...PROBLEM
after the timeout/broken anonymous connection impersonate failed. Login failed attempting to connect to %1
Set Error Response (User: Session: Error: 00027877 Message: Login failed attempting to connect to...)
Login failed. SBL-SMI-00101: The server is busy, please try again later.


No Application Object Manager log files are being generated for those failing connections.
We noticed that all Siebel Servers contain many 5 MB core dump files.
According to pstack and pmap outputs, the complete Call Stack of the processes that crashed is always the following:




libkernel32.so sys_setup (be395d50, be392d4c, 0, be395cf4, 0, be3a65a0) + 498
libkernel32.so MwKernel32Init (3, be39aa60, be39aa5c, be39aab0, b9ca0, ffbef147) + 4b8
libgdiuser32.so MwMainwinInit (1, be73f6f0, 2, 3, a89b4, ffbeea80) + 298
siebmtshmw mainwin_init (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 51e40) + 8c
libkernel32.so MwInitDLL (be744980, be722478, 0, be78cabc, be392d4c, bdfeae98) + 20
libgdiuser32.so void _Initializergdiuser_33_32::pre_construct() (be73f6f0, bdfeaf74, 15688, 20, 13984, be7448e0) + 44
libgdiuser32.so _init (0, bfbde7a8, bfbde0c4, bfbde7a8, 31fcc, bfbb00ac) + 48
ld.so.1 call_init (0, 0, bfbde270, bfbde7a8, 200000, bdc000a8) + 198
ld.so.1 setup (bfbde0d0, bfbde190, bfbde7a8, bfbe0f20, 0, bfbde0c4) + 13a8
ld.so.1 _setup (7, b00, ffffffff, ffffffff, bfba0000, ffbef070) + 3e8
ld.so.1 _rt_boot (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) + 88
???????? (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)


Error messages related to the crashes were logged in the Enterprise Server log file:




This means that a Server Component needed to
start a new process in order to handle more tasks, but the process
startup failed during Main Win Initialization.
This caused the Component to crash.


The log file does not show us the Component name, but if this was
an Object Manager, new users would be unable to login, while current
sessions would not be affected.

A new Multithreaded Server
Process is started for an Object Manager whenever the process currently
running reaches the MaxTasks/MaxMTServers ratio.

This happens only for Components with a certain amount of concurrent user sessions.
That
could explain why this behavior affects only some specific Object
Managers (probably the ones with higher demand for user sessions).

It also explains the timeout error messages we found in the Siebel Web Server Extension log files.

There are some known situations that could cause this behavior to happen, as described in the following document:




Cause


Memory segment used by Mainwin was defined too small.



Solution



This was determined as being caused by a memory segment used by Mainwin which was defined too small.

The resolution is to set $MW_GMA_SEGSIZE environment variable in siebmtshw shell script.
We suggest to add the following to $SIEBEL_ROOT/bin/siebmtshw, above the "exec siebmtshmw $@" line:



export MW_GMA_SEGSIZE=0x1000000


Then, restart the Siebel Server for this change to take effect.








Applies to:


Siebel System Software - Version 7.5.3 [16157] and later
z*OBSOLETE: Microsoft Windows 2000

Product Release: V7 (Enterprise)

Version: 7.5.3 [16157]

Database: Microsoft SQL Server 2000 SP3

Application Server OS: Microsoft Windows 2000 Advanced Server SP 4

Database Server OS: Microsoft Windows 2000 Advanced Server SP 4



This document was previously published as Siebel SR 38-1183053761.



***Checked for relevance on 02-NOV-2012***



Symptoms


SBL-SMI-00107, SBL-NET-01023, SBL-SSM-00004, SBL-SSM-00003, SBL-SSM-00006


Dear Tech Support,
We are having a serious issue with our Production url.
http://10.190.170.66/erm_enu
When we login to the url for the very first time,
We get a "Page Cannot Be Displayed" error
[Please look at the Screen shot -Error1.jpg]
When we look at the ERM Object Manager logs, we dont see any new task triggered for the ERM task.

If we refresh the screen, we get the login box, but with a "Page Cannot be Displayed" above the box.
[Please look at the Screen shot -Error2.jpg]
Now, the ERM object Manager log shows the following data:
"2021
2004-02-06 15:03:07 2004-02-06 15:23:14 +0530 00000009 001 001f 0001 09
ERMObjMgr_enu 43120 2640 3088
D:\sea753\siebsrvr\log\ERMObjMgr_enu_43120.log 7.5.3 [16157]
ENUGenericLog    GenericError    1    2004-02-06 15:03:07    Invocation
of Applet Menu New Service::NewExpense is not
allowed.GenericLog    GenericError    1    2004-02-06
15:03:07    Invocation of Applet Menu New Service::NewTimeSheet is not
allowed.GenericLog    GenericError    1    2004-02-06
15:03:07    Invocation of Applet Menu New Service::NewCommunication is
not allowed.GenericLog    GenericError    1    2004-02-06
15:03:07    Invocation of Applet Menu New Service::NewCorrespondence is
not allowed.GenericLog    GenericError    1    2004-02-06
15:03:07    Invocation of Search Client Service::OpenSrchCenter is not
allowed.GenericLog    GenericError    1    2004-02-06
15:03:07    Invocation of Persistent Customer Dashboard::OpenDashboard
is not allowed.GenericLog    GenericError    1    2004-02-06
15:03:07    Invocation of Persistent Customer Dashboard::ClearDashboard
is not allowed.GenericLog    GenericError    1    2004-02-06
15:03:07    Invocation of Persistent Customer Dashboard::CloseDashboard
is not allowed.GenericLog    GenericError    1    2004-02-06
15:03:07    Invocation of Search Client Service::AutoSearch is not
allowed."

If we finally refresh the screen for the third time, we could finally get into the application.

Can you Please get back to us as soon as possible because this is seriously affecting our production environment.





Cause


Configuration/ Setup



Solution



Message 1


For the benefit of other readers:

The customer had to refresh the browser three times before the Siebel Application login page would load.

We
initially determined that the cause of this problem was experienced
outside of the scope of the Siebel Application, as the customer
experienced the same behavior when attempting to display the default
page of their Web Server.

It was determined that the customer was
using a Cisco switch, configured with a Virtual IP address (VIP), to
load balance two Web Servers. The initial page loading problem only
occured when the client connection hit the VIP - if the client went to
the Web Server specific URLs, the pages loaded on the first hit.

The load balanced configuration on the switch was verified as correct.

It
transpired that one of the Web Server's Network cards did not have a
Default Gateway Server IP Address. This was determined by running
ipconfig on that machine. After providing the Default Gateway Server
value and restarting the IIS Services, the initial hit and thus
rendering the Siebel Login page, worked when using the VIP based URL.






Applies to:


Siebel CRM - Version 7.8.2 [19213] to 8.1.1 SIA [21111] [Release V7 to V8]
z*OBSOLETE: Microsoft Windows Server 2003

Product Release: V7 (Professional) and later

Version: 7.8.2 [19213]

Database: Microsoft SQL Server 2005

Application Server OS: Microsoft Windows 2003 Server

Database Server OS: Microsoft Windows 2003 Server



This document was previously published as Siebel SR 38-3304776353.





*** Checked for Relevance on 11-Sep-2012 ***


Symptoms


SBL-NET-01023, SBL-SCB-00011, SBL-SSM-00004, SBL-SSM-00006


We have launched Siebel today. Users are seeing 4 problems:



1. Server busy or problem experienced browser error

2. White screen with progress bar

3. Siebel splash screen with progress bar (no login box)

4. Users get into the system and then get booted out.



When first launched, we had serious avaikability issues as above.

We then changed the following settings:



1. MAX TASKS params for all object managers from 20 to 100 (as recommended in PRR) except fo UK OM which was changd to 200.

2. MAX TASKS for connection broker from 1 to 2.



Since these changes users have been able to access, but within last 1 hour we have again seen the same issues.



Cause


Encryption for the communication between Siebel web server and Siebel servers is set to MSCRYPTO



Solution



Message 1


As per the client description their siebel web client became unavailable at certain times.

After investigations the symptoms were found to be as follows:

On the siebel application server there was a siebmtshmw process that
became to use 100% CPU. This process did not became unresponsive but
instead to became idle when no requests where processed it went to
100%CPU. On a 4 processor box when there were 4 siebmtshmw processes
that went in this state the machine begun to respond very slow this
resulting in dropping new sessions and overall log responses to
incomming requests.

On the web server machine (IIS) there was present the same situation
(the siebel extensions out of process begun to consume 100%CPU)

The thread that consumed CPU was identified from the performance monitor
logs and then core dump where taken from these processes. The thread
was a communication thread between the siebel web extensions (SWSE) and
object manager (OM). The call stack for the corresponding thread was:



sslcnapi!compress_write+0xdb

sslcnapi!zlib_inflate+0x8d

sslcnapi!CSSSISConn::_DecodeRawMsg+0x158

sslcnapi!CSSSISConn::SisAsyncThreadMain+0x8d

sslcosd!OSDThreadStart+0x1c0 sslcosd!OSDNTThreadStart+0xc

msvcr70!beginthreadex+0xba

kernel32!GetModuleFileNameA+0xeb

...



The relevant line in the communication call stack is
CSSSISConn::_DecodeRawMsg. The customer had the encryption for the
communication set to MSCRYPTO. This encryption is not largely used or
recommended by Siebel. After setting the encryption to NONE the problem
did not re-occurred.



Resolution:



The customer choose to check if they need encrypted communication
between the web server and the application servers and if this is the
case use SSL instead.














Applies to:


Siebel System Software - Version: 7.5.3.6 [16186] to 8.1.1.3[21219] - Release: V7 to V8
z*OBSOLETE: Microsoft Windows 2000

Product Release: V7 (Enterprise)

Version: 7.5.3.6 [16186]

Database: Microsoft SQL Server 2000

Application Server OS: Microsoft Windows 2000 Advanced Server SP 3

Database Server OS: Microsoft Windows 2000 Advanced Server SP 3



This document was previously published as Siebel SR 38-1657913758.



Symptoms


Hi,

We are trying to renew the certificates, which will expire
on 12/22/05, for SSL encryption on our Siebel Enterprise Server. Before
implementing the new certificate to production, we are testing the
process in QA environment. We replaced the old certificate file,
certificate authority file and private key file with the new certificate
files on Siebel Server and SWSE (Web Server), but we have connection
issue. Please advise.


Attached please find the swse logs, eapps.cfg and siebns.dat. Please let me know if you need any other information.

Thanks!!



Cause


SBL-NET-01562: Unable to load private key D:\SSL\365key.pem


Solution



For the benefits of other users:

Customer is trying
to renew the certificate which is used for SISNAPI SSL encryption on
the Siebel Enterprise Server. SWSE log reported following error.

SBL-NET-01023: Peer disconnected
SBL-SSM-00004: SISNAPI Hello failed. The server component could be down.
SBL-SSM-00006: error sending message

Customer had been suggested to perform the following:

- Check and verify that the Object Manager is running.
- Increased the event logging for the correspondence Object Manager. Error below was reported on the Object Manager log.

SBL-NET-01562: Unable to load private key D:\SSL\365key.pem

Solution:

The
corrective action of the above error is to verify that the key is in
PEM format, and that the password for the key is correct. There is a
parameter named "keyfilepassword" which need to be set correspondence to
the password entered when generate the key. This parameter can be set
using srvrmgr command below.

srvrmgr /g gateway /e enterprise /s server /u username /p password
srvrmgr> change params keyfilepassword=<password> for server <server>

After setting the correct password, the system is backed up and running.